givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Dift vs Supp.to

Dift logo
Dift
EU · 1 countries

French associations running time-boxed fundraising challenges with volunteer collectors, companies pursuing social and environmental philanthropy, and individuals giving to vetted associations with tax receipts.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Supp.to logo
Supp.to
NL · 2 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Supp.to delivers 1.46 more per 100 to the recipient than Dift.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Dift in EUR, Supp.to in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about 1.46 more of every 100 donated than Dift (£99.51 vs €98.05 per 100).

Dift stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Supp.to does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Dift Supp.to
Recipient gets (per 100) €98.05 £99.51★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.7% + €0.25 0% + £0.49★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 2 countries★ winner
Data residency EU★ winner NL
Languages 2 2
Payment methods supported 0 17★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Supp.to

£99.51 vs €98.05 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Supp.to

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Dift

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Dift if

French associations running time-boxed fundraising challenges with volunteer collectors, companies pursuing social and environmental philanthropy, and individuals giving to vetted associations with tax receipts.

  • Structured, time-boxed fundraising challenges for associations with volunteer collectors
  • Supports individual solidarity pots, association challenges, and corporate giving operations
  • Automatic tax-receipt handling for individual and corporate donors
  • Vets the partner associations it lists, with a focus on social and ecological impact
Read full review →
Choose Supp.to if

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

  • Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
  • No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
  • Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
  • Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Dift or Supp.to?

Of every 100 donated, Dift delivers approximately €98.05 to the recipient and Supp.to delivers approximately £99.51. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Dift is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Dift operates in 1 countries; Supp.to operates in 2.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →