givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

DierenDonatie vs GINGER

DierenDonatie logo
DierenDonatie
EEA · 1 countries

Dutch animal shelters, wildlife-care centres, and animal-welfare foundations that need specific goods funded - food, equipment, or veterinary care - and value a CBF-accredited, transparent donation platform.

No rating yet
Read full review →
GINGER logo
GINGER
EU · 1 countries

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a €100 donation, DierenDonatie delivers €2.15 more to the recipient than GINGER.

DierenDonatie & GINGER don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, DierenDonatie delivers about €2.15 more of every €100 donated than GINGER (€100.00 vs €97.85).

On the headline numbers, DierenDonatie and GINGER are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric DierenDonatie GINGER
Recipient gets (€100) €100.00★ winner €97.85
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 1.8% + €0.35
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EEA EU
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 2 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
DierenDonatie

€100.00 vs €97.85 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose DierenDonatie if

Dutch animal shelters, wildlife-care centres, and animal-welfare foundations that need specific goods funded - food, equipment, or veterinary care - and value a CBF-accredited, transparent donation platform.

  • Exclusively focused on animal-welfare causes in the Netherlands
  • Recognised as one of the first CBF-accredited donation platforms (CBF-Erkend Donatieplatform)
  • Product-fulfilment model: donors fund specific items the platform buys and ships to the foundation
  • Flat per-project contribution (EUR 10 up to EUR 300, EUR 25 above) rather than a percentage cut of donations
Read full review →
Choose GINGER if

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

  • One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
  • Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
  • Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
  • Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DierenDonatie or GINGER?

On a €100 donation, DierenDonatie delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and GINGER delivers approximately €97.85. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

DierenDonatie operates in 1 countries; GINGER operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →