givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Crowdfunding voor Clubs vs voordekunst

Crowdfunding voor Clubs logo
Crowdfunding voor Clubs
— · 1 countries

Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations that want to combine donation crowdfunding with bond-based club financing, and that prefer iDEAL payments with predictable per-donation or subscription pricing.

No rating yet
Read full review →
voordekunst logo
voordekunst
EU · 1 countries

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a €100 donation, Crowdfunding voor Clubs delivers €0.67 more to the recipient than voordekunst.

Crowdfunding voor Clubs & voordekunst don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

voordekunst stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Crowdfunding voor Clubs does not.

On the headline numbers, Crowdfunding voor Clubs and voordekunst are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Crowdfunding voor Clubs voordekunst
Recipient gets (€100) €92.20★ winner €91.53
Platform fee 7.5%★ winner 8.47%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.30★ winner 0% + €0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Crowdfunding voor Clubs

€92.20 vs €91.53 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
voordekunst

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Crowdfunding voor Clubs if

Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations that want to combine donation crowdfunding with bond-based club financing, and that prefer iDEAL payments with predictable per-donation or subscription pricing.

  • Purpose-built for Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations
  • Combines donation crowdfunding with club-bond (obligatie) financing on one platform
  • Two pricing tracks: a 7.5% per-donation fee (VAT-inclusive) or a fixed annual subscription
  • iDEAL payments processed through Mollie, the standard Dutch online payment rail
Read full review →
Choose voordekunst if

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

  • Deep specialization in arts and culture with vetted, project-based campaigns.
  • Operated by a CBF-recognized charitable foundation with funds held in trust.
  • Hands-on coaching, workshops, and editorial guidance for campaign makers.
  • Supports iDEAL, credit card, PayPal, plus Bancontact, Maestro, and Sofort.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Crowdfunding voor Clubs or voordekunst?

On a €100 donation, Crowdfunding voor Clubs delivers approximately €92.20 to the recipient and voordekunst delivers approximately €91.53. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

voordekunst is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Crowdfunding voor Clubs operates in 1 countries; voordekunst operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →