givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Classy vs voordekunst

Classy logo
Classy
US · 4 countries

Mid-to-large US nonprofits running enterprise-scale peer-to-peer campaigns, ticketed events, and recurring-giving programmes that need depth beyond a basic donation page.

No rating yet
Read full review →
voordekunst logo
voordekunst
EU · 1 countries

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Classy delivers 5.77 more per 100 to the recipient than voordekunst.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Classy in GBP, voordekunst in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Classy delivers about 5.77 more of every 100 donated than voordekunst (£97.30 vs €91.53 per 100).

voordekunst stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Classy does not.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes
Credit card 2.4% + £0.30 £97.30 0% platform fee
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Classy voordekunst
Recipient gets (per 100) £97.30★ winner €91.53
Platform fee 0%★ winner 8.47%
Payment processing fee 2.4% + £0.30★ winner 0% + €0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 4 countries★ winner 1 countries
Data residency US EU★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 6★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Classy

£97.30 vs €91.53 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Classy

4 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
voordekunst

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Classy if

Mid-to-large US nonprofits running enterprise-scale peer-to-peer campaigns, ticketed events, and recurring-giving programmes that need depth beyond a basic donation page.

  • Enterprise-grade peer-to-peer, events, and recurring-giving tooling.
  • Now part of GoFundMe Pro, backed by GoFundMe's reach and 190-million community.
  • Essentials plan with zero subscription fees and no setup costs for smaller nonprofits.
  • Multi-currency settlement in US dollar, Canadian dollar, pound, Australian dollar, and euro.
Read full review →
Choose voordekunst if

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

  • Deep specialization in arts and culture with vetted, project-based campaigns.
  • Operated by a CBF-recognized charitable foundation with funds held in trust.
  • Hands-on coaching, workshops, and editorial guidance for campaign makers.
  • Supports iDEAL, credit card, PayPal, plus Bancontact, Maestro, and Sofort.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Classy or voordekunst?

Of every 100 donated, Classy delivers approximately £97.30 to the recipient and voordekunst delivers approximately €91.53. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

voordekunst is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Classy operates in 4 countries; voordekunst operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →