givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Classy vs iHelp

Classy logo
Classy
US · 4 countries

Mid-to-large US nonprofits running enterprise-scale peer-to-peer campaigns, ticketed events, and recurring-giving programmes that need depth beyond a basic donation page.

No rating yet
Read full review →
iHelp logo
iHelp
EU · 1 countries

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, iHelp delivers 2.70 more per 100 to the recipient than Classy.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Classy in GBP, iHelp in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 2.70 more of every 100 donated than Classy (€100.00 vs £97.30 per 100).

iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Classy does not.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes
Credit card 2.4% + £0.30 £97.30 0% platform fee
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Classy iHelp
Recipient gets (per 100) £97.30 €100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 2.4% + £0.30 0% + €0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 4 countries★ winner 1 countries
Data residency US EU★ winner
Languages 1 2★ winner
Payment methods supported 6★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iHelp

€100.00 vs £97.30 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Classy

4 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iHelp

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Classy if

Mid-to-large US nonprofits running enterprise-scale peer-to-peer campaigns, ticketed events, and recurring-giving programmes that need depth beyond a basic donation page.

  • Enterprise-grade peer-to-peer, events, and recurring-giving tooling.
  • Now part of GoFundMe Pro, backed by GoFundMe's reach and 190-million community.
  • Essentials plan with zero subscription fees and no setup costs for smaller nonprofits.
  • Multi-currency settlement in US dollar, Canadian dollar, pound, Australian dollar, and euro.
Read full review →
Choose iHelp if

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

  • No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
  • NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
  • Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
  • Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Classy or iHelp?

Of every 100 donated, Classy delivers approximately £97.30 to the recipient and iHelp delivers approximately €100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iHelp is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Classy operates in 4 countries; iHelp operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →