givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

BuonaCausa vs Give Lively

BuonaCausa logo
BuonaCausa
EU · 1 countries

Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Give Lively logo
Give Lively
US · 1 countries

US 501(c)(3) nonprofits seeking a fully underwritten, no-cost fundraising toolkit - campaign pages, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer, and events - backed by philanthropist founders rather than platform charges.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, BuonaCausa delivers 2.50 more per 100 to the recipient than Give Lively.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: BuonaCausa in EUR, Give Lively in USD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about 2.50 more of every 100 donated than Give Lively (€100.00 vs $97.50 per 100).

BuonaCausa stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Give Lively does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric BuonaCausa Give Lively
Recipient gets (per 100) €100.00★ winner $97.50
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 2.2% + $0.30
Trustpilot — (0) 3.3 (1)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner US
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 4 6★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
BuonaCausa

€100.00 vs $97.50 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Give Lively

— vs 3.3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
BuonaCausa

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose BuonaCausa if

Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

  • Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
  • No platform commission charged on donations
  • Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
  • Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform
Read full review →
Choose Give Lively if

US 501(c)(3) nonprofits seeking a fully underwritten, no-cost fundraising toolkit - campaign pages, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer, and events - backed by philanthropist founders rather than platform charges.

  • Underwritten by philanthropist founders, so member nonprofits are not charged for the software.
  • Full toolkit: campaign pages, donation widgets, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer, team fundraising, and events.
  • Donors can opt to cover processing, helping organizations keep the full gift.
  • Rapid disbursement with no holding period.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, BuonaCausa or Give Lively?

Of every 100 donated, BuonaCausa delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and Give Lively delivers approximately $97.50. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

BuonaCausa is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

BuonaCausa operates in 1 countries; Give Lively operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →