givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Big Give vs Little Phil

Big Give logo
Big Give
UK · 1 countries

UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Little Phil logo
Little Phil
Outside AU (SG/HK/US) · 1 countries

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Big Give delivers 2.05 more per 100 to the recipient than Little Phil.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Big Give in GBP, Little Phil in AUD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Big Give delivers about 2.05 more of every 100 donated than Little Phil (£100.00 vs A$97.95 per 100).

On the headline numbers, Big Give and Little Phil are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Big Give Little Phil
Recipient gets (per 100) £100.00★ winner A$97.95
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.00★ winner 1.75% + A$0.30
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency UK Outside AU (SG/HK/US)
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 4 4
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Big Give

£100.00 vs A$97.95 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Big Give if

UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

  • Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
  • Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
  • Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
  • Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.
Read full review →
Choose Little Phil if

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

  • Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
  • Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
  • Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
  • Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Big Give or Little Phil?

Of every 100 donated, Big Give delivers approximately £100.00 to the recipient and Little Phil delivers approximately A$97.95. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Big Give operates in 1 countries; Little Phil operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →