givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

BetterWorld vs GINGER

BetterWorld logo
BetterWorld
— · 0 countries

Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

GINGER logo
GINGER
EU · 1 countries

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, GINGER delivers 1.05 more per 100 to the recipient than BetterWorld.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: BetterWorld in GBP, GINGER in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, GINGER delivers about 1.05 more of every 100 donated than BetterWorld (€97.85 vs £96.80 per 100).

GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while BetterWorld does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric BetterWorld GINGER
Recipient gets (per 100) £96.80 €97.85★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 2.9% + £0.30 1.8% + €0.35★ winner
Trustpilot 2.9 (2)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency EU★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 5★ winner 4
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
GINGER

€97.85 vs £96.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
BetterWorld

2.9 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
GINGER

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
GINGER

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose BetterWorld if

Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

  • Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
  • No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
  • Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
  • Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.
Read full review →
Choose GINGER if

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

  • One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
  • Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
  • Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
  • Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, BetterWorld or GINGER?

Of every 100 donated, BetterWorld delivers approximately £96.80 to the recipient and GINGER delivers approximately €97.85. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

GINGER is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

BetterWorld operates in 0 countries; GINGER operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →