givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Alvarum vs iRaiser

Alvarum logo
Alvarum
France · 0 countries

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

No rating yet
Read full review →
iRaiser logo
iRaiser
EEA · 19 countries

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

No rating yet
Read full review →

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Alvarum in EUR, iRaiser in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Alvarum does not.

On the headline numbers, Alvarum and iRaiser are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Alvarum iRaiser
Recipient gets (per 100) €97.85 £97.85
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.9% + €0.25 1.9% + £0.25
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 0 countries 19 countries★ winner
Data residency France EEA★ winner
Languages 2 5★ winner
Payment methods supported 1 23★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Tied

Fees are level on a credit-card donation.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iRaiser

19 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iRaiser

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Alvarum if

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

  • Donations are routed directly to the beneficiary charity and settled on an automated monthly cycle rather than held by the platform.
  • Strong fit for sports-challenge and participatory event fundraising such as marathons and cycling events.
  • European local payment methods - iDEAL, Bancontact, Sofort, and SEPA direct debit - alongside Visa and Mastercard cards.
  • Payments handled by HiPay, a payment institution authorised by France's ACPR; Alvarum registered with ORIAS as a donation crowdfunding intermediary.
Read full review →
Choose iRaiser if

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

  • Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
  • Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
  • Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
  • Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Alvarum or iRaiser?

Of every 100 donated, Alvarum delivers approximately €97.85 to the recipient and iRaiser delivers approximately £97.85. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iRaiser is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Alvarum operates in 0 countries; iRaiser operates in 19.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →