givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Alvarum vs iDonate.ie

Alvarum logo
Alvarum
France · 0 countries

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

No rating yet
Read full review →
iDonate.ie logo
iDonate.ie
EEA · 1 countries

Irish charities, clubs, schools, and community causes that want low transaction-only fees and a broad set of fundraising tools, including donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and events.

The headline

On a €100 donation, Alvarum delivers €0.05 more to the recipient than iDonate.ie.

Alvarum & iDonate.ie don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

iDonate.ie stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Alvarum does not.

On the headline numbers, Alvarum and iDonate.ie are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Alvarum iDonate.ie
Recipient gets (€100) €97.85★ winner €97.80
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.9% + €0.25★ winner 1.95% + €0.25
Trustpilot — (0) 4.9 (494)★ winner
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency France EEA★ winner
Languages 2★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 1 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Alvarum

€97.85 vs €97.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
iDonate.ie

— vs 4.9 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iDonate.ie

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iDonate.ie

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Alvarum if

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

  • Donations are routed directly to the beneficiary charity and settled on an automated monthly cycle rather than held by the platform.
  • Strong fit for sports-challenge and participatory event fundraising such as marathons and cycling events.
  • European local payment methods - iDEAL, Bancontact, Sofort, and SEPA direct debit - alongside Visa and Mastercard cards.
  • Payments handled by HiPay, a payment institution authorised by France's ACPR; Alvarum registered with ORIAS as a donation crowdfunding intermediary.
Read full review →
Choose iDonate.ie if

Irish charities, clubs, schools, and community causes that want low transaction-only fees and a broad set of fundraising tools, including donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and events.

  • 0% platform fee with a transaction-only cost of 1.95% + EUR0.25 per donation.
  • No setup or monthly fees.
  • Donor-covers-the-fee option can reduce the net deduction for causes.
  • Broad fundraising toolkit: donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and event fundraising.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Alvarum or iDonate.ie?

On a €100 donation, Alvarum delivers approximately €97.85 to the recipient and iDonate.ie delivers approximately €97.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iDonate.ie is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Alvarum operates in 0 countries; iDonate.ie operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →