givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Alvarum vs Geef.nl

Alvarum logo
Alvarum
France · 0 countries

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Geef.nl logo
Geef.nl
EEA (NL host) · 1 countries

Dutch charities and good causes wanting a long-established, ANBI-aware giving platform usable at no charge, and donors who want most of their gift to reach the cause.

The headline

On a €100 donation, Alvarum delivers €1.24 more to the recipient than Geef.nl.

Alvarum & Geef.nl don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Alvarum delivers about €1.24 more of every €100 donated than Geef.nl (€97.85 vs €96.61).

Geef.nl stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Alvarum does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Alvarum Geef.nl
Recipient gets (€100) €97.85★ winner €96.61
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.9% + €0.25★ winner 2.5% + €0.89
Trustpilot — (0) 2.4 (8)★ winner
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency France EEA (NL host)★ winner
Languages 2★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Alvarum

€97.85 vs €96.61 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Geef.nl

— vs 2.4 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Geef.nl

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Geef.nl

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Alvarum if

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

  • Donations are routed directly to the beneficiary charity and settled on an automated monthly cycle rather than held by the platform.
  • Strong fit for sports-challenge and participatory event fundraising such as marathons and cycling events.
  • European local payment methods - iDEAL, Bancontact, Sofort, and SEPA direct debit - alongside Visa and Mastercard cards.
  • Payments handled by HiPay, a payment institution authorised by France's ACPR; Alvarum registered with ORIAS as a donation crowdfunding intermediary.
Read full review →
Choose Geef.nl if

Dutch charities and good causes wanting a long-established, ANBI-aware giving platform usable at no charge, and donors who want most of their gift to reach the cause.

  • Long-established Dutch giving platform, online since 2004 with a 20-year track record.
  • Strong charity orientation with ANBI status surfaced on charity profiles.
  • Donor-funded cost model under which recipients are not charged to use the service.
  • Donations processed through an escrow foundation (Stichting Derdengelden Geef) since 2011.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Alvarum or Geef.nl?

On a €100 donation, Alvarum delivers approximately €97.85 to the recipient and Geef.nl delivers approximately €96.61. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Geef.nl is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Alvarum operates in 0 countries; Geef.nl operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →