givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

4fund.com vs iRaiser

4fund.com logo
4fund.com
— · 30 countries

Individuals, charities, and small organisations across the EEA who want a multilingual, no-commission fundraiser backed by an established Polish crowdfunding operator with EU payment-institution licensing.

iRaiser logo
iRaiser
EEA · 19 countries

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a £100 donation, 4fund.com delivers £2.15 more to the recipient than iRaiser.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, 4fund.com delivers about £2.15 more of every £100 donated than iRaiser (£100.00 vs £97.85).

iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while 4fund.com does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric 4fund.com iRaiser
Recipient gets (£100) £100.00★ winner £97.85
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.00★ winner 1.9% + £0.25
Trustpilot 3.9 (461)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 30 countries★ winner 19 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 30★ winner 5
Payment methods supported 14 23★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
4fund.com

£100.00 vs £97.85 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
4fund.com

3.9 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
4fund.com

30 vs 19 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iRaiser

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose 4fund.com if

Individuals, charities, and small organisations across the EEA who want a multilingual, no-commission fundraiser backed by an established Polish crowdfunding operator with EU payment-institution licensing.

  • Operated by Zrzutka.pl, the company behind Poland's long-established zrzutka.pl crowdfunding platform, with over a decade of experience.
  • Run by an operator that describes itself as an EU-licensed payment services provider supervised by Poland's financial regulator.
  • Charges organisers no commission and takes no cut on deposits or withdrawals; sustained by an optional voluntary donor contribution.
  • Broad European payment-rail support: iDEAL, Bancontact, MultiBanco, MB Way, and EPS, plus cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Revolut Pay, Skrill, N26, and ZEN.
Read full review →
Choose iRaiser if

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

  • Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
  • Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
  • Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
  • Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, 4fund.com or iRaiser?

On a £100 donation, 4fund.com delivers approximately £100.00 to the recipient and iRaiser delivers approximately £97.85. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iRaiser is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

4fund.com operates in 30 countries; iRaiser operates in 19.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →