# BuonaCausa vs Petje Af

## Vad siffrorna säger.

Vid betalning med Credit card når med BuonaCausa ungefär 6.00 mer fram till mottagaren per 100 donerade än med Petje Af (€100.00 mot kr94.00 per 100). BuonaCausa lagrar givardata inom EES — en praktisk fördel för GDPR-känsliga kampanjer — det gör inte Petje Af.

## Sida vid sida.

| Mått | BuonaCausa | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Mottagaren får | €100.00 | kr94.00 |
| Plattformsavgift | 0% | 6% |
| Transaktionsavgift | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + kr0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 64 |
| Landtäckning | 1 | 0 |
| Datalagring | EU | — |
| Språk | 1 | 0 |
| Betalmetoder som stöds | 4 | 0 |

## Välj BuonaCausa om

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Välj Petje Af om

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.