# BuonaCausa vs iHelp

## Ce spun datele.

La cifrele principale, BuonaCausa și iHelp sunt foarte apropiate — alegerea mai bună ține de disponibilitatea Credit card, de acoperirea lingvistică și de unde se află donatorii tăi.

## Una lângă alta.

| Indicator | BuonaCausa | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Beneficiarul primește | €100.00 | €100.00 |
| Comision al platformei | 0% | 0% |
| Comision de procesare a plății | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 50 |
| Acoperire pe țări | 1 | 1 |
| Stocarea datelor | EU | EU |
| Limbi | 1 | 2 |
| Metode de plată acceptate | 4 | 1 |

## Alege BuonaCausa dacă

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Alege iHelp dacă

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.