# iHelp vs Petje Af

## O que dizem os dados.

Pagando por Credit card, com iHelp chegam ao destinatário cerca de €6.00 a mais por cada €100 doados do que com Petje Af (€100.00 vs €94.00). iHelp guarda os dados dos doadores dentro do EEE — uma vantagem prática para campanhas sensíveis ao RGPD — Petje Af não.

## Lado a lado.

| Métrica | iHelp | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| O beneficiário recebe | €100.00 | €94.00 |
| Taxa da plataforma | 0% | 6% |
| Taxa de processamento de pagamento | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 64 |
| Cobertura de países | 1 | 0 |
| Residência de dados | EU | — |
| Idiomas | 2 | 0 |
| Métodos de pagamento suportados | 1 | 0 |

## Escolhe o iHelp se

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Escolhe o Petje Af se

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.