# GINGER vs Petje Af

## O que dizem os dados.

Pagando por Credit card, com GINGER chegam ao destinatário cerca de €3.85 a mais por cada €100 doados do que com Petje Af (€97.85 vs €94.00). GINGER guarda os dados dos doadores dentro do EEE — uma vantagem prática para campanhas sensíveis ao RGPD — Petje Af não.

## Lado a lado.

| Métrica | GINGER | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| O beneficiário recebe | €97.85 | €94.00 |
| Taxa da plataforma | 0% | 6% |
| Taxa de processamento de pagamento | 1.8% + €0.35 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 64 |
| Cobertura de países | 1 | 0 |
| Residência de dados | EU | — |
| Idiomas | 1 | 0 |
| Métodos de pagamento suportados | 4 | 0 |

## Escolhe o GINGER se

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Escolhe o Petje Af se

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.