# GINGER vs Little Phil

## O que dizem os dados.

GINGER guarda os dados dos doadores dentro do EEE — uma vantagem prática para campanhas sensíveis ao RGPD — Little Phil não. Nos números principais, GINGER e Little Phil estão muito equilibrados — a melhor escolha depende da disponibilidade de MB WAY, da cobertura de idiomas e de onde estão os teus doadores.

## Lado a lado.

| Métrica | GINGER | Little Phil |
| --- | --- | --- |
| O beneficiário recebe | €97.85 | A$97.95 |
| Taxa da plataforma | 0% | 0% |
| Taxa de processamento de pagamento | 1.8% + €0.35 | 1.75% + A$0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 52 |
| Cobertura de países | 1 | 1 |
| Residência de dados | EU | Outside AU (SG/HK/US) |
| Idiomas | 1 | 1 |
| Métodos de pagamento suportados | 4 | 4 |

## Escolhe o GINGER se

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Escolhe o Little Phil se

> Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

- Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
- Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
- Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
- Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.