# GINGER vs Kagnotte

## O que dizem os dados.

GINGER guarda os dados dos doadores dentro do EEE — uma vantagem prática para campanhas sensíveis ao RGPD — Kagnotte não. Nos números principais, GINGER e Kagnotte estão muito equilibrados — a melhor escolha depende da disponibilidade de MB WAY, da cobertura de idiomas e de onde estão os teus doadores.

## Lado a lado.

| Métrica | GINGER | Kagnotte |
| --- | --- | --- |
| O beneficiário recebe | €97.85 | €98.75 |
| Taxa da plataforma | 0% | 1% |
| Taxa de processamento de pagamento | 1.8% + €0.35 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 3.9 (249) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 49 |
| Cobertura de países | 1 | 1 |
| Residência de dados | EU | — |
| Idiomas | 1 | 1 |
| Métodos de pagamento suportados | 4 | 2 |

## Escolhe o GINGER se

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Escolhe o Kagnotte se

> French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

- Low headline pricing: a small per-contribution commission plus a fixed amount, undercutting many higher-rate rivals.
- Unlimited withdrawals to a bank account at no additional charge.
- No subscription or setup cost to create and manage a pot.
- Regulated fund custody via Lemonway, authorised by France's ACPR (no. 16568).