# BuonaCausa vs iHelp

## O que dizem os dados.

Nos números principais, BuonaCausa e iHelp estão muito equilibrados — a melhor escolha depende da disponibilidade de MB WAY, da cobertura de idiomas e de onde estão os teus doadores.

## Lado a lado.

| Métrica | BuonaCausa | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| O beneficiário recebe | €100.00 | €100.00 |
| Taxa da plataforma | 0% | 0% |
| Taxa de processamento de pagamento | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 50 |
| Cobertura de países | 1 | 1 |
| Residência de dados | EU | EU |
| Idiomas | 1 | 2 |
| Métodos de pagamento suportados | 4 | 1 |

## Escolhe o BuonaCausa se

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Escolhe o iHelp se

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.