# Raisely vs Teaming

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card Teaming przekazuje odbiorcy o około zł1.70 więcej z każdych zł100 darowizny niż Raisely (zł100.00 vs zł98.30). W kluczowych liczbach Raisely i Teaming idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Raisely | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł98.30 | zł100.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.4% + zł0.30 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 82 | 80 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 8 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | AU/UK/US | — |
| Języki | 1 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 0 |

## Wybierz Raisely, jeśli

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.


## Wybierz Teaming, jeśli

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.