# OnParticipe vs Teaming

## Co mówią liczby.

OnParticipe ma wyższą ocenę na Trustpilot (3.0/5), ale opiera się ona na zaledwie 21 opiniach — to za mało wobec 2.8/5 platformy Teaming z 10 opinii. W kluczowych liczbach OnParticipe i Teaming idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | OnParticipe | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €100.00 | zł100.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3 (21) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 74 | 80 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | France | — |
| Języki | 1 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 1 | 0 |

## Wybierz OnParticipe, jeśli

> French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

- No commission on collections, so organisers keep the entire amount raised and ticket revenue.
- Designed and hosted in France, with French customer support available seven days a week.
- Funded by an optional donor tip rather than a mandatory platform charge.
- Systematic identity-document checks on organisers for fraud control.


## Wybierz Teaming, jeśli

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.