# iRaiser vs Raisely

## Co mówią liczby.

iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — Raisely nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Raisely nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | iRaiser | Raisely |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.85 | zł98.30 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.9% + zł0.25 | 1.4% + zł0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 82 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 19 | 8 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EEA | AU/UK/US |
| Języki | 5 | 1 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 23 | 0 |

## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Wybierz Raisely, jeśli

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.