# iRaiser vs Petje Af

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iRaiser przekazuje odbiorcy o około zł3.85 więcej z każdych zł100 darowizny niż Petje Af (zł97.85 vs zł94.00). iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — Petje Af nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Petje Af nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | iRaiser | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.85 | zł94.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 6% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.9% + zł0.25 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 75 | 64 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 19 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EEA | — |
| Języki | 5 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 23 | 0 |

## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.


## Wybierz Petje Af, jeśli

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.