# iHelp vs Raisely

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iHelp przekazuje odbiorcy o około 1.70 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż Raisely (€100.00 vs zł98.30 na 100). iHelp przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Raisely nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | iHelp | Raisely |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €100.00 | zł98.30 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + €0.00 | 1.4% + zł0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 82 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 8 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | AU/UK/US |
| Języki | 2 | 1 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 1 | 0 |

## Wybierz iHelp, jeśli

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Wybierz Raisely, jeśli

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.