# iHelp vs Petje Af

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iHelp przekazuje odbiorcy o około 6.00 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż Petje Af (€100.00 vs zł94.00 na 100). iHelp przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Petje Af nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | iHelp | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €100.00 | zł94.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 6% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 50 | 64 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | — |
| Języki | 2 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 1 | 0 |

## Wybierz iHelp, jeśli

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.


## Wybierz Petje Af, jeśli

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.