# GoFundMe vs Teaming

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card Teaming przekazuje odbiorcy o około 3.15 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż GoFundMe (zł100.00 vs $96.85 na 100). W kluczowych liczbach GoFundMe i Teaming idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | GoFundMe | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | $96.80 | zł100.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 2.9% + $0.30 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (24037) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 92 | 80 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 20 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | US | — |
| Języki | 7 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 7 | 0 |

## Wybierz GoFundMe, jeśli

> Individual fundraisers in the US, UK, and English-speaking markets running personal causes (medical, memorial, emergencies) where brand reach matters more than EU data residency.

- Largest global brand in donation crowdfunding with strong organic discoverability
- 0% platform fee since 2017 (donor tips fund the platform)
- Wide international country coverage and currency support
- Established trust signals through high-profile media coverage


## Wybierz Teaming, jeśli

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.