# GlobalGiving vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iRaiser przekazuje odbiorcy o około 5.85 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż GlobalGiving (zł97.85 vs $92.00 na 100). iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — GlobalGiving nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — GlobalGiving nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | GlobalGiving | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | $92.00 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 5% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 3% + $0.00 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 84 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 0 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | US | EEA |
| Języki | 1 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 11 | 23 |

## Wybierz GlobalGiving, jeśli

> Donors and companies wanting to give to vetted grassroots nonprofits worldwide, and smaller international NGOs seeking a due-diligence stamp and access to US donors and corporate giving programs.

- Rigorous due-diligence vetting of every nonprofit, a strong trust signal for donors.
- Global reach connecting donors and companies with grassroots nonprofits worldwide.
- Established track record since 2002 with more than a million donors.
- Corporate-giving and disaster-relief programs beyond individual donations.


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.