# Givio vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card Givio przekazuje odbiorcy o około 2.15 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż iRaiser (€100.00 vs zł97.85 na 100). iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — Givio nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Givio nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Givio | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €100.00 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + €0.00 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 22 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | EEA |
| Języki | 1 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 3 | 23 |

## Wybierz Givio, jeśli

> German nonprofits and associations that want to collect donations and tap an additional passive income stream through the linked Gooding charity-shopping service.

- Operated by a Stuttgart-based nonprofit limited company (Givio gGmbH).
- Donation collection combined with the Gooding charity-shopping channel for passive, shopping-based giving.
- Payments handled by established partners including Stripe, PayPal, and the Bank für Sozialwirtschaft.
- Focus on transparent, secure donation handling for German nonprofits.


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.