# Give Lively vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — Give Lively nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Give Lively nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Give Lively | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | $97.50 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 2.2% + $0.30 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (1) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 87 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | US | EEA |
| Języki | 0 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 6 | 23 |

## Wybierz Give Lively, jeśli

> US 501(c)(3) nonprofits seeking a fully underwritten, no-cost fundraising toolkit - campaign pages, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer, and events - backed by philanthropist founders rather than platform charges.

- Underwritten by philanthropist founders, so member nonprofits are not charged for the software.
- Full toolkit: campaign pages, donation widgets, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer, team fundraising, and events.
- Donors can opt to cover processing, helping organizations keep the full gift.
- Rapid disbursement with no holding period.


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.