# GINGER vs Supp.to

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card Supp.to przekazuje odbiorcy o około 1.66 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż GINGER (zł99.51 vs €97.85 na 100). GINGER przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Supp.to nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | GINGER | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €97.85 | zł99.51 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.8% + €0.35 | 0% + zł0.49 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 56 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 2 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | NL |
| Języki | 1 | 2 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 4 | 17 |

## Wybierz GINGER, jeśli

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Wybierz Supp.to, jeśli

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.