# GINGER vs Raisely

## Co mówią liczby.

GINGER przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Raisely nie. W kluczowych liczbach GINGER i Raisely idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | GINGER | Raisely |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €97.85 | zł98.30 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.8% + €0.35 | 1.4% + zł0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 82 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 8 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | AU/UK/US |
| Języki | 1 | 1 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 4 | 0 |

## Wybierz GINGER, jeśli

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Wybierz Raisely, jeśli

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.