# GINGER vs PIFworld

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card GINGER przekazuje odbiorcy o około €4.25 więcej z każdych €100 darowizny niż PIFworld (€97.85 vs €93.60). GINGER przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — PIFworld nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | GINGER | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €97.85 | €93.60 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 6.05% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.8% + €0.35 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 56 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 1 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | — |
| Języki | 1 | 2 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 4 | 0 |

## Wybierz GINGER, jeśli

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Wybierz PIFworld, jeśli

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.