# GINGER vs Petje Af

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card GINGER przekazuje odbiorcy o około 3.85 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż Petje Af (€97.85 vs zł94.00 na 100). GINGER przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Petje Af nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | GINGER | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €97.85 | zł94.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 6% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.8% + €0.35 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 64 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | — |
| Języki | 1 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 4 | 0 |

## Wybierz GINGER, jeśli

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Wybierz Petje Af, jeśli

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.