# GINGER vs Little Phil

## Co mówią liczby.

GINGER przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Little Phil nie. W kluczowych liczbach GINGER i Little Phil idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | GINGER | Little Phil |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €97.85 | A$97.95 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.8% + €0.35 | 1.75% + A$0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 65 | 52 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 1 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | Outside AU (SG/HK/US) |
| Języki | 1 | 1 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 4 | 4 |

## Wybierz GINGER, jeśli

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)


## Wybierz Little Phil, jeśli

> Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

- Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
- Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
- Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
- Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.