# Funraise vs iHelp

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iHelp przekazuje odbiorcy o około 8.50 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż Funraise (€100.00 vs zł91.50 na 100). iHelp przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Funraise nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Funraise | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł91.50 | €100.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 5% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 2.9% + zł0.60 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 50 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 0 | 1 |
| Lokalizacja danych | US | EU |
| Języki | 0 | 2 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 5 | 1 |

## Wybierz Funraise, jeśli

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.


## Wybierz iHelp, jeśli

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.