# FundRazr vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iRaiser przekazuje odbiorcy o około zł1.05 więcej z każdych zł100 darowizny niż FundRazr (zł97.85 vs zł96.80). iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — FundRazr nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — FundRazr nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | FundRazr | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł96.80 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 2.9% + zł0.30 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 0 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | Canada and US | EEA |
| Języki | 1 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 4 | 23 |

## Wybierz FundRazr, jeśli

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.