# EcoCrowd vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iRaiser przekazuje odbiorcy o około 8.10 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż EcoCrowd (zł97.85 vs €89.75 na 100). iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — EcoCrowd nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — EcoCrowd nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | EcoCrowd | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €89.75 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 8% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.9% + €0.35 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 46 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | DE | EEA |
| Języki | 1 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 3 | 23 |

## Wybierz EcoCrowd, jeśli

> German environmental and sustainability nonprofits - associations, foundations, and gGmbHs - seeking community-backed funding for SDG-aligned projects through a curated monthly donation pool.

- Operated by the Deutsche Umweltstiftung, an established German environmental foundation.
- Sharp focus on sustainability and UN Sustainable Development Goal-aligned projects.
- Distinctive monthly donation-pool model with a community vote on which project is funded.
- Accepts PayPal and bank transfer, with donations starting from one euro.


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.