# Doare vs iHelp

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iHelp przekazuje odbiorcy o około 6.25 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż Doare (€100.00 vs R$93.75 na 100). iHelp przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Doare nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Doare | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | R$93.75 | €100.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 5.8% + R$0.45 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 50 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 1 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | EU |
| Języki | 3 | 2 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 8 | 1 |

## Wybierz Doare, jeśli

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.


## Wybierz iHelp, jeśli

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.