# Dift vs Raisely

## Co mówią liczby.

Dift przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Raisely nie. W kluczowych liczbach Dift i Raisely idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Dift | Raisely |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €98.05 | zł98.30 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.7% + €0.25 | 1.4% + zł0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 51 | 82 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 8 |
| Lokalizacja danych | EU | AU/UK/US |
| Języki | 2 | 1 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 0 |

## Wybierz Dift, jeśli

> French associations running time-boxed fundraising challenges with volunteer collectors, companies pursuing social and environmental philanthropy, and individuals giving to vetted associations with tax receipts.

- Structured, time-boxed fundraising challenges for associations with volunteer collectors
- Supports individual solidarity pots, association challenges, and corporate giving operations
- Automatic tax-receipt handling for individual and corporate donors
- Vets the partner associations it lists, with a focus on social and ecological impact


## Wybierz Raisely, jeśli

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.