# CotizUp vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — CotizUp nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — CotizUp nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | CotizUp | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.60 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 1.9% + zł0.50 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | 4.2 (2713) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | EEA |
| Języki | 1 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 1 | 23 |

## Wybierz CotizUp, jeśli

> French individuals and groups raising money for personal causes, projects, or collective gifts who want a simple cagnotte with no platform commission and a keep-it-all model.

- No platform commission, so organisers keep what they raise (keep-it-all model)
- Simple cagnotte format designed for quick, shareable group collections
- Optional donor tip is fully voluntary and can be adjusted or removed before paying
- Card and bank processing charges are passed through at cost rather than marked up


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.