# Coral vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iRaiser przekazuje odbiorcy o około 1.00 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż Coral (zł97.85 vs €96.85 na 100). iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — Coral nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Coral nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Coral | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | €96.85 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 2.9% + €0.25 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 42 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | EEA |
| Języki | 1 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 23 |

## Wybierz Coral, jeśli

> Spanish associations, foundations, and grassroots social or animal-welfare causes that want a zero-commission platform where donors can cover processing fees so the cause receives the full donation.

- 0% platform commission, sustained by voluntary donor tips (propinas)
- Stripe payment processing at 2.9% plus EUR 0.25 per donation, with donors able to cover the fee at checkout
- Automatic donation certificates for nonprofits accredited under Spain's Law 49/2002
- Specialised in solidarity causes: NGOs, foundations, animal rescue, and social projects


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.