# Continue to Give vs Raisely

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card Raisely przekazuje odbiorcy o około zł1.25 więcej z każdych zł100 darowizny niż Continue to Give (zł98.30 vs zł97.05). W kluczowych liczbach Continue to Give i Raisely idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Continue to Give | Raisely |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.05 | zł98.30 |
| Prowizja platformy | 2.7% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + zł0.00 | 1.4% + zł0.30 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 82 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 2 | 8 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | AU/UK/US |
| Języki | 0 | 1 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 0 |

## Wybierz Continue to Give, jeśli

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Wybierz Raisely, jeśli

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.

