# Continue to Give vs Petje Af

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card Continue to Give przekazuje odbiorcy o około zł3.05 więcej z każdych zł100 darowizny niż Petje Af (zł97.05 vs zł94.00). W kluczowych liczbach Continue to Give i Petje Af idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Continue to Give | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.05 | zł94.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 2.7% | 6% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + zł0.00 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 64 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 2 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | — |
| Języki | 0 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 0 |

## Wybierz Continue to Give, jeśli

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Wybierz Petje Af, jeśli

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.

