# Continue to Give vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — Continue to Give nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Continue to Give nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Continue to Give | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.05 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 2.7% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + zł0.00 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 2 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | EEA |
| Języki | 0 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 23 |

## Wybierz Continue to Give, jeśli

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.