# Continue to Give vs iHelp

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card iHelp przekazuje odbiorcy o około 2.95 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż Continue to Give (€100.00 vs zł97.05 na 100). iHelp przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Continue to Give nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Continue to Give | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.05 | €100.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 2.7% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + zł0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 50 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 2 | 1 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | EU |
| Języki | 0 | 2 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 1 |

## Wybierz Continue to Give, jeśli

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Wybierz iHelp, jeśli

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.