# Continue to Give vs GINGER

## Co mówią liczby.

GINGER przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Continue to Give nie. W kluczowych liczbach Continue to Give i GINGER idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Continue to Give | GINGER |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł97.05 | €97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 2.7% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + zł0.00 | 1.8% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 65 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 2 | 1 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | EU |
| Języki | 0 | 1 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 0 | 4 |

## Wybierz Continue to Give, jeśli

> US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

- All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
- Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
- Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
- Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.


## Wybierz GINGER, jeśli

> Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

- One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
- Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
- Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
- Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)