# Big Give vs iRaiser

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card Big Give przekazuje odbiorcy o około 2.15 więcej z każdych 100 darowizny niż iRaiser (£100.00 vs zł97.85 na 100). iRaiser obsługuje BLIK — metodę płatności, z której korzysta większość darczyńców w Polsce — Big Give nie. iRaiser przechowuje dane darczyńców w EOG — praktyczna przewaga przy kampaniach wrażliwych na RODO — Big Give nie.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | Big Give | iRaiser |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | £100.00 | zł97.85 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 0% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 0% + £0.00 | 1.9% + zł0.25 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 75 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 1 | 19 |
| Lokalizacja danych | UK | EEA |
| Języki | 1 | 5 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 4 | 23 |

## Wybierz Big Give, jeśli

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.


## Wybierz iRaiser, jeśli

> Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

- Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.