# BetterWorld vs Petje Af

## Co mówią liczby.

Przy płatności Credit card BetterWorld przekazuje odbiorcy o około zł2.80 więcej z każdych zł100 darowizny niż Petje Af (zł96.80 vs zł94.00). W kluczowych liczbach BetterWorld i Petje Af idą łeb w łeb — lepszy wybór zależy od dostępności BLIK, obsługi języków i tego, gdzie są twoi darczyńcy.

## Obok siebie.

| Kryterium | BetterWorld | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Odbiorca dostaje | zł96.80 | zł94.00 |
| Prowizja platformy | 0% | 6% |
| Opłata za obsługę płatności | 2.9% + zł0.30 | 0% + zł0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 64 |
| Zasięg krajowy | 0 | 0 |
| Lokalizacja danych | — | — |
| Języki | 1 | 0 |
| Obsługiwane metody płatności | 5 | 0 |

## Wybierz BetterWorld, jeśli

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Wybierz Petje Af, jeśli

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.

