# PIFworld vs Teaming

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Teaming reverse environ €6.40 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que PIFworld (€100.00 contre €93.60). Sur les chiffres clés, PIFworld et Teaming se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | PIFworld | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €93.60 | €100.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 6.05% | 0% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.35 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 56 | 80 |
| Couverture géographique | 1 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 2 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 0 | 0 |

## Choisis PIFworld si

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.


## Choisis Teaming si

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.