# Petje Af vs Teaming

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Teaming reverse environ €6.00 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Petje Af (€100.00 contre €94.00). Sur les chiffres clés, Petje Af et Teaming se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Petje Af | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €94.00 | €100.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 6% | 0% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 63 | 80 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 0 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 0 | 0 |

## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.


## Choisis Teaming si

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.